Who gives anyone else the right to bread when others are starving? The rich steal other people's work and have no rights, but they too should be fed.
They did under our law: if you'd asked for food in two parishes you were entitled to take what you needed. That's normal amongst humans. The rich steal everyone else's property and everyone has the right to take it back.
The rich do not pay you enough, so it is right to take everything you can from them and share it with human beings.
Of course it isn't immaterial: property is theft.
I would steal. Stealing is something certainly expected (especially humans that living below the hunger threshold)that's why people have insurance against theft on their valuable things. statistics tell this whatever the reasons people do it.
I would steal to feed my family, I would do many things to protect my family.
I nave never had a rich person steal from me, that is odd lolo.
Never worked then.? Lucky old you. Whatever you do is worth not what you are paid for it but what the employer gets - out of which he gives you a proportion, stealing the rest. The theft is the only work he does, but he spends some of your money on brainwashing you.
Never worked then.? Lucky old you. Whatever you do is worth not what you are paid for it but what the employer gets - out of which he gives you a proportion, stealing the rest. The theft is the only work he does, but he spends some of your money on brainwashing you.
Never worked then.? Lucky old you. Whatever you do is worth not what you are paid for it but what the employer gets - out of which he gives you a proportion, stealing the rest. The theft is the only work he does, but he spends some of your money on brainwashing you.
Never worked then.? Lucky old you. Whatever you do is worth not what you are paid for it but what the employer gets - out of which he gives you a proportion, stealing the rest. The theft is the only work he does, but he spends some of your money on brainwashing you.
...snip....
For several years Ireland has been experimenting with "co-op" corporations (similar to "employee owned" here in the states, with a few caveats). What's new about it is that employees not only own "shares", but they have equal voting power on salaries and other corporate decisions. I think this is sort of a "middle ground" approach to what you're suggesting?
This sounds like an excellent option...could even be adapted to the "Walmarts" of the world if they became a private union.
I do not see corporate profit as akin to stealing. I do not see myself as brainwashed by my employer. And, I do not see making a profit as the only work a corporation does.
Making stuff, and selling it seems pretty standard human practice.
I get your point Iolo, but aren't you discounting the value of raw materials, initial infrastructure investment, operating expenses, and all the other responsibilities that go along with business ownership? And aren't business owners "entitled" to profit from that investment?
For several years Ireland has been experimenting with "co-op" corporations (similar to "employee owned" here in the states, with a few caveats). What's new about it is that employees not only own "shares", but they have equal voting power on salaries and other corporate decisions. I think this is sort of a "middle ground" approach to what you're suggesting?
Who digs the raw materials, whose money pays for the infrastructure and all the rest? Are burglars 'entitled' to what they get by their hard work? I could live very happily with a co-operative approach though, like John Lewis stores over here.
I was going to leave this alone, but....I....can't!....:devil:
Who digs the raw materials? The employees of the raw material suppliers, and they receive their "portion" of the value via paycheck. You are correct that their labor is represented in the value of the product, but you don't believe that receiving their paycheck represents that value.
All that said, now the company goes bankrupt....By your definition, the employees would also be responsible for any debts the company owed....yes?
Burglars? entitled?? Of course they are! They're "self-employed"![]()
I was going to leave this alone, but....I....can't!....:devil:
Who digs the raw materials? The employees of the raw material suppliers, and they receive their "portion" of the value via paycheck. You are correct that their labor is represented in the value of the product, but you don't believe that receiving their paycheck represents that value.
All that said, now the company goes bankrupt....By your definition, the employees would also be responsible for any debts the company owed....yes?
Burglars? entitled?? Of course they are! They're "self-employed"![]()
Obviously the value of a commodity is the price it fetches, which belongs to those who do the work. Employers steal part of it. I do not believe in capitalist companies. We will take over and make democratic decisions abnout what is needed. Nobody needs thieves, however much they brainwash mugs.
Obviously the value of a commodity is the price it fetches, which belongs to those who do the work. Employers steal part of it. I do not believe in capitalist companies. We will take over and make democratic decisions abnout what is needed. Nobody needs thieves, however much they brainwash mugs.
Okay...a question:
How will you sustain your new found society without a base of capital?