You're right, the word "security" doesn't imply payment, the word "work" implies payment.
No it doesn't. Plenty of people do"work" every day on a volunteer basis, entirely without pay. To say their work is not work is an extreme disrespect to them, who deserve perhaps more respect than the ones who do get paid. And I would include George Zimmerman as one of those to be highly respected volunteers.
I feed stray cats in my apartment community every morning. I don't get paid. I assure you. It IS work.
Incorrect. If you're not employed then you're not covered by the insurance of the business and/or property owner. That's why neighborhood watch and even most private security firms stick with the observe and report model. Something else to note in this case is that Zimmerman was not operating his neighborhood watch on public property..
When one has done security work (both with and without pay) for 38 years, as I have, and in supervisory positions as well as ordinary guard jobs, it is easy to spot when someone is just making things up as they go along, as you appear to be doing now. Your statement here is so convoluted I can hardly even address it. The observe and report protocol is not a "model", it is the standard security MO for every security operation in America. As for public or private property, this has no bearing. Security MO is approximately the same either way, and insurance doesn't matter much either.
This has been disputed. The Sanford Police have Zimmerman listed as the coordinator but how he came to be the coordinator is less clear. The reports of resident complaints regarding Zimmerman's actions as the NW "captain" are documented well enough that I'm not going to bother linking, anyone interested can easily find those reports online.
Disputed ? HA HA. By whom ? The race hustlers who created this whole fiasco ? I'm not going to bother linking, because how Z came to be the coordinator is quite clear. This is old ground, I'm not going to go over again and again., The CNN reports et all all said his community group requested him to do the job. Anyone interested can easily find those reports online.
I agree and this is the problem. Zimmerman is always going to be a lightning rod because of what he represents, a legal idea that is so foreign to some people that they can't believe he was allowed to do what he did. Extending Castle Doctrine onto public property is a horrible idea, the Zimmerman-Martin case just gives people a chance to personify the issue.
This statement goes beyond wrong and goes well into the realm of bizzare. "Foreign" ? If any people find the legal ideas of self-defense, of community security, and maintaining peace and law and order to be "foreign", then I don't know what they've been smoking or drinking.
Everything about what Zimmerman did is 100% American and normal procedure, fully supported by the American people for hundreds of years.
Also, what Zimmerman did is not extending castle doctrine on to public property. The apartment complex is PRIVATE property, and the residents living there have every bit as much right to defend it as one does of the individual home. Hundreds of people crossed Zimmerman's path for many months before the Martin shooting and they did not get shot. Martin did because he committed a violent criminal act, which had no reason to be tolerated.