Thank you for saying this. This is one of the reasons why I didn't want to talk to you and Protectionist at the same time. My problem was specifically with the description of Zimmerman as a security worker which was made in the OP and I didn't want "someone" to be able to confuse the issue by quoting things I said to you in regards to the NW and applying them to any argument made regarding Zimmerman's "security personnel" status because they're two different subjects.
Zimmerman NEEDED to Carry Gun - Here's Why!!!
- Thread starter Protectionist
- Start date
- Status
Thank you for saying this. This is one of the reasons why I didn't want to talk to you and Protectionist at the same time. My problem was specifically with the description of Zimmerman as a security worker which was made in the OP and I didn't want "someone" to be able to confuse the issue by quoting things I said to you in regards to the NW and applying them to any argument made regarding Zimmerman's "security personnel" status because they're two different subjects.
Post #40? I read that right after you posted it. You modified it after I read it. I find it interesting that you didn't call my attention to this when you were in the thread earlier today and this had been an issue. Perhaps you were too busy modifying posts # 40 and #42? You do know that others can see what you're doing and that it was known to all who bothered to check exactly how much time you spent "editing"?
At this point I'm reluctant to engage someone who makes a habit of instead of just answering questions or addressing issues decides to alter posts in an attempt to make it seem as if he had been straightforward all along and then resorts to calling out others for "making things up".
I'm not going to iggy you because there just aren't that many active posters here but I'm not going to waste my time responding to you anymore or hoping that we can have an honest and open discussion, not because I disagree with you on the Zimmerman issue but because I think what you've been doing with your post modifications is, let's say, "less than honest and meant to mislead".
No they're not, as I explained in post # 61. Security is security wherever it is, and whatever you call it.
So what's wrong with editing ? Sure I edited. I edit all the time. Been doing it for years. Sometimes you think of more to say in a particular post, so you add something in. That's why the option exists. If you don't like the format of the forum, don't post here.
As for > "attempt to make it seem as if he had been straightforward all along and then resorts to calling out others for "making things up", I don't even know what the heck that means, nor do I care much about any of the cockammaie things you seem to keep coming up with. Looks like you imagine too much.
If you knew anything about my posting (so as to be minimally qualified to sit in judgement of me as a poster), you'd know that I edit posts all the time, no matter who I'm talking to, and have done it thousands of times, for years. The stuff you're writing is a laughingstock. :giggle:
It already DID END in July, except that William decided to resurrect it yesterday, with a pile of OFF TOPIC stuff, I might add. The topic is why Zimmerman NEEDED to Carry a Gun, and the examples I supplied from my neck of the woods (Central Florida) >> NOT the stuff William has been ranting about ever since Post # 31.
1. LEON DASH 48
CLEARWATER FLA.
JULY 2007
While working security at a club he was attacked and died of head trauma.
2. CARL SHOAL 41
TAMPA, FLA.
JANUARY 2007
Was stabbed to death while working security at an apartment complex.
3. CHRISTOPHER MANOS 27
TAMPA FLA.
OCTOBER 2006
Was shot while sitting in a guard shack at the Tampa Electric Company.
To whomever closes the thread >>> THANK YOU!!
Last edited:
- Status