I find it likely many were horrified and emotional on an individual basis...I did not state otherwise. However, it seems this incident has reached a national level of emotion...as stated.
Reached a national level of kneejerk, I'll agree.
I find it likely many were horrified and emotional on an individual basis...I did not state otherwise. However, it seems this incident has reached a national level of emotion...as stated.
Emotions are never a valid reason to strip rights away.
To me a far greater tragedy is the loss of the rights of three hundred million people due to media caterwalling.
We shouldn't fear guns, if they call them assault weapons or ultra mega death weapons. But then again I don't allow wool to be pulled over my eyes
Agreed.
Children dying is a larger tragedy, but the media you are correct, is caterwalling and many observers falling right in behind them.
Niether should we blame guns as many do here.....or pretend like we need some scientific study to ask why our culture is rotting from the inside out.
I see....so a better course would be something unscientific to study.
Hmmmm.....perhaps emotion?
Or, no study.....so we can just be stupid.
If the root problem is societal/cultural, an unscientific something is exactly what should be studied.
A study on why so many people have ignored the holocaust happening every single year but rather get emotional(your words not mine) following media caterwalling would be interesting, but irrelevant.
Oh, we're already being stupid. We've thrown studies at drug use, alcoholism, divorce, fatherless households, child abuse, and gun crime. Any focus on any cultural rot whatsoever gets hijacked on some socialist dream that government funded studies are required before a government mandated solution is rendered......to be scientific and what not.
In other words...We have yet to understand, and should simply stop trying.
That certainly exemplifies our human history.
In other words...We have yet to understand, and should simply stop trying.
That certainly exemplifies our human history.
We understand, many are too afraid or too ingrained in denial to admit it.
So does gun ownership
For more than three decades, Chinese women have been subjected to their country's brutal one-child policy. Those who try to have more children have been subjected to fines and forced abortions. Their houses have been razed and their husbands fired from their jobs. As a result, Chinese women have a fertility rate of 1.54. Here in America, white, college-educated women—a good proxy for the middle class—have a fertility rate of 1.6. America has its very own one-child policy. And we have chosen it for ourselves.
The data available is total and complete and repetitive. You aren't addressing social issues and therefore, I don't think able to understand the actual problems.
No one ever said that, you're in denial that federal studies can be political, that much is wholesale obvious.
The government wants in what sense? If in a political sense, then not true. Look at basic research at the NIH...Scientists do not get funded by the regulatory agencies unless they are going to study and issue reports the government wants.
Can you imagine BATF spending a few tens of missions of dollars to study the defensive use of arms by citizens?
No. But you can imagine a study of gun violence.
If you choose not to understand this fundamental Golden Rule (He who has the gold makes the rules) you will not understand anything.
Let me throw some 'science' of my own in here.....what I think cuts and slices at the edges of society, what I believe devalues our culture is what is responsible for much of the extraordinary violence we continue to see. Now....I ain't no rocket scientist....nor do I receive government funding thinking any answers whatsoever come from Washington DC. I believe the what I refer to above is a devaluing of life itself in this nation. I happen to see it everywhere, and do not excude myself. Society is much more rude. Language borders on between American sailor and Russian Cossack. Disrespect reigns supreme. I see the cultural rot, the less care for each other, look what we do to our most precious resource. We abandon, we abuse, and othersise neglect our children at holocaust levels given our free and supposedly educated nation. Our single parent household and fatherless children rates.....are a national embarrassment.
I've heard some say we moved from God. Others who point out the hate and rage between class and/or ethnicity. Still others want to spend alot more money to conduct studies on guns when a violect act occurs. Let me show you....I hope all can see, I have a subcrip to the Wall Street Journal but I think you can see this link.....this one is a shocker....and I think directly related to what I'm speaking to.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323375204578270053387770718.html
And not merely white educated women as the article points out.......All of our demographics seeing drops in birth rates, our families are being destroyed ladies and gentlemen. And if this countinues, all of this is over, imo. It ain't responsible for every violent act. It ain't the answer all. But this is an absolute slap in the face to America, you had better wake up, fellow Patriots. China installs it's own birth control, we've done it to ourselves. There is less respect for family and individual lives today, you see it everywhere. The bell has rung, society so far isn't answering.....and the answers surely ain't comin from this circus clown in the WHite House.
What does this all have to do with guns?
Either way, what does it have to do with family values either?
Educated people tend to have less children- not just in this country, but around the world. And it has nothing to do with a lack of respect for family. I love my family tremendously and I believe in the family unit strongly, but I don't see myself having more than 2 kids- 3 tops.
The birth rate is concerning yes, but it isn't a hard issue to solve for the US- increase immigration. Tyler Cowen goes as far as to support a population increase to around 500 million.
Increase immigration so we can expand our welfare roles and government dependency rankings? The middle class needs to thrive. Education taken from special interests, demands muct be put on our children. See.....this is where you mistake our issues for a numbers game, our birth rate decline is just another symptom revealing the ultimate problem. Our families are disintegrating.
Is the NIH a regulatory agency? Yes, in a political sense there is a great living to be made if you can make the case that we need more government. Have you heard of any government sponsored research into how we can get by with less government?The government wants in what sense? If in a political sense, then not true. Look at basic research at the NIH...
No doubt the government can waste dollars on whatever it wants to. I am not making the case that government officials try to influence the outcome of a particular study. Why do that when you can choose to fund the research that intend to make the case you want to make and not fund research that would give the opposing answer?Again, If the government wants to fund a relatively unbiased study it can do so. Your issue is when political players try to influence a study, which is certainly possibility, but then that isn't the policy I am even supporting...
Have you heard of any government sponsored research into how we can get by with less government?
The thing is it isn't a "golden rule". It is just something you made up and have no proof of. Actually, it is quite a broad absolute statement and there are plenty of examples that disprove it.If you choose not to understand this fundamental Golden Rule (He who has the gold makes the rules) you will not understand anything."
Lol, so you think that the data and facts DO show that guns increase these crimes? You just basically said that. So then it is you that is trying to cover up the truth, isn't it?No doubt the government can waste dollars on whatever it wants to. I am not making the case that government officials try to influence the outcome of a particular study. Why do that when you can choose to fund the research that intend to make the case you want to make and not fund research that would give the opposing answer?
The thing is it isn't a "golden rule". It is just something you made up and have no proof of. Actually, it is quite a broad absolute statement and there are plenty of examples that disprove it.
Lol, so you think that the data and facts DO show that guns increase these crimes? You just basically said that. So then it is you that is trying to cover up the truth, isn't it?
Guns don't increase crimes
Show me the study that absolutely (as in when applied to any country, culture, jurisdiction, etc.) suggests that in a statistically significant way.