No. Center of mass when possible--mid-to upper chest is best. In this case I could clearly see his head. I intended to kill him. He suddenly realized that if he came back out of his truck with a weapon he would be dead before he could use it.
He turned very white and drove away.
Last edited:
It is certainly safer for criminals. It is way less safer for the rest of us.I believe its safer to not have guns in everyones car/house/ handbag
An armed society is a polite society...
Yeah...this was very polite:
"(CBS) Jacksonville, Fla. - Police say a 45-year-old man was taken into custody Saturday for fatally shooting a Florida teenager last week at a Jacksonville gas station after an argument that began over loud music."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_...man-after-dispute-over-loud-music-police-say/
If everyone knew that everyone else was armed then no one would start a fight over trivialities.
Sorry, I had to remove your link. For reasons known only to the owner I cannot quote a post with a link in it until I have ten posts.
Okay...in the perfect world the mere threat of violent retribution would scare everyone else into submissive worry to the point of avoiding said violence...wish we lived there.
As for the limit on your ability to link...well, lets just say we are careful.
I'm sure YOU understand.
Actually a disarmed populace held down by a semi-benevolent 1984 style police state is a polite society, ie. Singapore.
I agree with your sentiments but lets not pretend we live in some militant utopia.
I believe its safer to not have guns in everyones car/house/ handbag
Honestly the guns in handbags and homes are normally the safe ones, its the ones on the streets that make the ones in handbags and homes necessary.
I would gladly give up my guns if they could take them away from the criminals first.
Slice it however we like...facts remain.
A man confronted people because of loud music, and killed some one.
As I have stated before (in another thread), when we can end someones life because they piss us off....something is terribly wrong.
In this case he pled guilty. So apparently he is.
how do you know what happened between these two things. If the teens became violent, it would have been them in the aggressive attack, regardless of any words. Dunn has the right to say those things, nobody has any right to attack because somebody says something they don't like. If the kids had just ignored him this wouldn't have occurred
Well everybody all through time has been able to end peoples lives for any reason, there is nothing new, this is as old as humanity.
Obviously he didn't get away with it because he pled guilty.
But cave men could kill people with sharp sticks if they didn't like the color of their hair in the 11th century soddy could kill you just because, nothing has changed. It is terrible that people do such things, but there is nothing anybody can do, ever to stop it. That is why we have a penal system.
It is necessary to not let CBS, and other nobodys to meddle in our justice system. Telling people about this has done nothing, nobody is better off, I think the contrary is true. So why pervert or justice system with neerdowell journalists that really know nothing about the investigation process.
Question #1~ We are careful about the ability to link due to internet Spam. By limiting a new members ability to link we tend to avoid Bots going nuts...as well as Spammers selling Viagra.
Question 2~ I did not change my position between posts 9 and 11. Instead pointing out that though I do not think guns should be in the hands of the mentally unstable, I do not see myself as qualified to decide "Who" meets the criteria.
Question 2~ I did not change my position between posts 9 and 11. Instead pointing out that though I do not think guns should be in the hands of the mentally unstable, I do not see myself as qualified to decide "Who" meets the criteria.
The ten post baricade
I was referring to the ten post barricade. Does something magical happen between post nine and post eleven?
For those who prefer to be subjects instead of citizens there are many other countries where one can go.
Does this become impossible once I reach ten posts?
I was referring to the ten post barricade. Does something magical happen between post nine and post eleven?
Fortunately for all of us we do not have to rely upon your judgment. The right to self defense cannot ever be denied to us.
For those who prefer to be subjects instead of citizens there are many other countries where one can go.
The challenge is in defining who the crazy people are. In the former Soviet Union you were diagnosed as crazy if you did not want to be a democrat, er, uh, Communist.
That's be clever if Democrats weren't some of the most anti-socialist people around.
Only they are not. 53% view socialism favorably. If you are democrat it is an even bet that you are a closet socialist.
Similar threads
